Comparison between Microsoft TechEd and Apple WWDC

Microsoft TechEd Apple WWDC ComparedNext week, Microsoft TechEd and Apple WWDC will organize conferences for developers and IT professionals. These conferences will be hosted in separate venues. For Apple, it is in San Francisco, where it will be called WWDC, or Worldwide Developers Conference. For Microsoft, it will be held in New Orleans, dubbed as the TechEd.

The conferences will begin on June 7, which is a Monday. In a way, these events will further increase the growing competition between the two huge companies. It can be said that the two are different kinds of companies since Apple is more inclined to the consumers while Microsoft is more towards the world of business technology, but the line that distinguishes the two is slowly erasing, and the competition between the two increases.

The keynote speaker for TechEd will be Bob Muglia, who is the president of server and tools business of Microsoft. He will talk about the vision of Microsoft in terms of the future of cloud computing and information technology. Meanwhile, Steve Ballmer will speak for WWDC as rumored, but the keynote address will be delivered by Steve Jobs, the Apple CEO himself.

Specifically, these conferences will be held in the following venues. For WWDC, it will be at the Moscone Center in San Francisco. For TechEd, it will be at the Ernest N. Morial Convention Center, located in New Orleans.

Adoption of New Airline Rules a Necessity

New Airline Industry Rules ProtestedConsumers have been regularly complaining about several things regarding the airline industry, and although summer has come to an end, the Transportation Department of the United States is responding to these complaints. These new rules will mostly be for the benefits of the passengers, more than they are for the airlines. These new rules will address the complaints of the passengers.

During the summer, many passengers went for vacation, and numerous complaints were recorded, the most common being that passengers are denied boarding passes simply because of oversold flights by the airlines. This is dubbed as one of the most unfair practices of airlines. Another thing that airlines do is that they cancel flights instead of making their passengers wait. This is because if the passengers wait for more than 3 hours and their next flight hasn’t arrived yet, they will be fined, and they want to escape that. Fines can reach up to $27,500.

That’s just one of the new rules. Another rule is that passengers will be compensated if the substitute transportation arrives within an hour or two. This compensation is not new, but this new rule increases the compensation by a lot more than 50 percent. Furthermore, airlines are obliged to state the compensation offer instead of showing travel vouchers as alternatives. Yet another rule is the added responsibility to hand out timely notices in case delays are inevitable.

Big Savings on Fuel – Possible for Cars and SUV’s

Fuel Efficiency for Modern CarsThe National Research Council released a report last Thursday that fuel consumption by passenger cars, SUV’s, mini-vans and light trucks can be reduced without sacrificing safety or performance of the vehicle. But the technology comes at a price – anywhere from a few hundred dollars to several thousand dollars per vehicle.

The report which tackled 3-types of automotive engines found: The full combination of improved technologies could reduce fuel consumption by 29% in medium and large cars and pick-up trucks with conventional engines at an added cost to consumers of about $2,200. Smaller reductions can be achieved for smaller amounts.

The key to whether consumers will spend more money on fuel-efficient cars is the price of gasoline, according to Gloria Bergquist, vice president of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers. When gasoline was priced at $4 per gallon a few years ago, consumers were lining up for fuel-efficient cars, but as the price declined, consumer interest.

Jim Kliesch, a senior engineer with the Union of Concerned Scientists said that “The Environmental Protection Agency has a “tear down” study under way that look part-by-part at the components in vehicles, how much they cost to produce and how much it would cost to reduce fuel consumption. The results should provide a more accurate idea of the cost of adding fuel-saving technologies to new cars and light trucks.”

The Department of Transportation rules requires new cars to achieve a fleet-wide average of 34.1 mpg by 2016.

Blog Widget by LinkWithin